Put Your Best Foot Forward: Guide to Bunion Coding
Jennifer McNamara — August 15, 2024
Bunions, medically known as hallux valgus, are a common condition where a bony bump forms on the joint at the base of the big toe. This condition can cause significant discomfort and often requires medical intervention, ranging from conservative treatment to surgical correction. For healthcare professionals, particularly medical coders, understanding how to accurately code for bunions is essential for proper documentation, billing, and reimbursement.
What is a Bunion? Before diving into the coding specifics, it's important to understand what a bunion is. A bunion is a deformity characterized by lateral deviation of the big toe, accompanied by a prominent bone that forms at the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint. Over time, this can lead to pain, difficulty walking, and a variety of other foot problems.
Common Symptoms and Diagnosis
Patients with bunions typically present with symptoms such as:
Pain and tenderness in the MTP joint
Redness and swelling around the joint
Restricted movement of the big toe
Visible bump on the side of the foot
Diagnosis is often made through physical examination and confirmed with imaging studies like X-rays, which help assess the extent of the deformity.
Coding for Bunion Diagnosis
When coding for a bunion diagnosis, ICD-10-CM provides specific codes based on the location and severity of the condition. The primary codes used for bunion diagnoses are:
M21.611: Bunion of right foot
M21.612: Bunion of left foot
M21.619: Bunion of unspecified foot
It is crucial to choose the correct laterality (right or left foot) to ensure accurate coding and avoid claim denials. In cases where the laterality is not specified, M21.619 can be used, though it is always preferable to include as much detail as possible.
Surgical Treatment and Procedure Coding
When conservative treatments fail, surgical intervention might be necessary. The goal of bunion surgery, also known as a bunionectomy, is to correct the deformity, alleviate pain, and restore normal foot function. There are several types of bunion surgeries, each with its own CPT code:
CPT 28292: Correction, hallux valgus (bunionectomy), with sesamoidectomy, when performed; with resection of proximal phalanx base, when performed, any method
Resection of Proximal Phalanx Base: This procedure involves removing the base of the proximal phalanx (the bone in the big toe closest to the foot). This reduces the deformity by shortening the toe, which can help alleviate pain and improve function. The sesamoid bones, located beneath the first metatarsal head, may also be removed if they are contributing to the deformity or pain.
CPT 28295: Correction, hallux valgus (bunionectomy), with proximal metatarsal osteotomy, any method
Proximal Metatarsal Osteotomy: This procedure involves cutting and repositioning the first metatarsal bone near the base (proximal end) of the bone to correct the alignment of the big toe. This helps to correct more severe deformities by realigning the bones to reduce the angle of the bunion. Proximal refers to the section of the bone closer to the center of the body, which in this case is the part of the metatarsal bone near the midfoot.
CPT 28296: Correction, hallux valgus (bunionectomy), with distal metatarsal osteotomy, any method
Distal Metatarsal Osteotomy: This type of osteotomy is performed at the distal end (closer to the toe) of the first metatarsal bone. The bone is cut and repositioned to correct the angle of the big toe. Distal refers to the section of the bone farther from the center of the body, which in this case is the part of the metatarsal bone near the toe. This procedure helps to address the deformity and improve the overall alignment of the foot.
CPT 28297: Correction, hallux valgus (bunionectomy), with first metatarsal and medial cuneiform joint arthrodesis, any method
First Metatarsal and Medial Cuneiform Joint Arthrodesis: Arthrodesis is the surgical fusion of a joint. In this procedure, the first metatarsal bone and the medial cuneiform bone are fused to stabilize the joint and correct the bunion deformity. This procedure is often chosen for more severe cases or when joint instability is a concern.
CPT 28298: Correction, hallux valgus (bunionectomy), with proximal phalanx osteotomy, any method
Proximal Phalanx Osteotomy: This procedure involves cutting and repositioning the proximal phalanx of the big toe to correct the bunion deformity. The osteotomy allows the surgeon to realign the toe and reduce the deformity.
CPT 28299: Correction, hallux valgus (bunionectomy), with double osteotomy, any method
Double Osteotomy: This procedure involves performing two separate bone cuts to correct the alignment of the big toe. Typically, one osteotomy is performed at the proximal end of the first metatarsal bone, and another at the distal end. The double osteotomy allows for more significant correction of the bunion deformity, making it suitable for more severe cases. This procedure can realign both the big toe and the first metatarsal bone, providing a more comprehensive correction.
Each procedure code corresponds to a specific surgical technique, so it's important to code based on the documentation provided by the surgeon. The complexity of the procedure, whether it involves osteotomy (cutting of the bone), exostectomy (removal of part of the bone), or sesamoidectomy (removal of small bones beneath the big toe), must be carefully considered.
Documentation Requirements
Accurate coding is directly tied to thorough and precise documentation. Here are some specific examples of what should be documented:
Diagnosis:
Clearly document the diagnosis using the appropriate ICD-10-CM code. Specify the laterality (right, left, or unspecified foot) and the exact nature of the deformity (e.g., bunion, hallux valgus).
Example: “Patient presents with a painful bunion on the left foot, confirmed by physical examination and X-ray. Diagnosis: M21.612 (Bunion of left foot).”
Surgical Technique:
Detail the specific surgical approach and techniques used, including whether an osteotomy was performed and its location (proximal or distal).
Example: “Performed a proximal metatarsal osteotomy on the left first metatarsal bone to correct hallux valgus. The bone was cut, realigned, and fixed with screws. Additionally, the proximal phalanx base was resected to reduce deformity.”
Additional Procedures:
If a sesamoidectomy or joint arthrodesis was performed, this should be clearly documented, including the rationale for these additional procedures.
Example: “Sesamoid bones were removed due to impingement and pain under the first metatarsal head. Arthrodesis was performed between the first metatarsal and medial cuneiform to stabilize the joint.”
Patient Symptoms:
Document the patient’s symptoms, including pain levels, functional impairment, and how these symptoms have been impacting the patient’s daily life.
Example: “Patient reports significant pain at the bunion site, rated 8/10, with difficulty walking and wearing shoes. Symptoms have persisted for over a year with conservative treatment providing minimal relief.”
Post-Operative Plan:
Include a detailed post-operative plan, including any weight-bearing restrictions, physical therapy recommendations, and follow-up appointments.
Example: “Post-operative plan includes non-weight-bearing on the left foot for six weeks, followed by progressive weight-bearing as tolerated. Physical therapy to start at six weeks post-op to regain range of motion and strength. Follow-up appointment scheduled for two weeks post-op.”
Coders should be careful in reviewing the documentation to ensure that all relevant information is captured and that the correct codes are applied. The more detailed and precise the documentation, the easier it will be to assign the appropriate CPT and ICD-10 codes, which will facilitate accurate billing and reimbursement.
Coding Tips and Considerations
Bundle Carefully: Be aware of NCCI (National Correct Coding Initiative) edits that may apply when coding multiple procedures. Some procedures may be bundled together, and unbundling them could lead to denials.
Verify Payer Guidelines: Different payers may have specific requirements for bunion surgery coverage. Always check payer-specific policies to ensure compliance and avoid claim rejections.
Bunion coding requires a solid understanding of both the anatomical aspects of the condition and the procedural nuances of surgical correction. Accurate coding ensures that healthcare providers are reimbursed correctly and that patient records reflect the true nature of their condition and treatment.
For medical coders, staying updated on the latest coding guidelines and payer requirements is key to mastering bunion coding. Proper documentation, careful code selection, and adherence to coding rules are essential in achieving optimal outcomes in the billing and reimbursement process.
Many medical providers are undercoding evaluation & managment visits because they are creatures of habit. Are you still coding and documenting the same way you have been for years? If you answer yes to that question, you could be leaving money on the table.
The coding and documentation rules for E&M coding changed significantly in 2021 with some additional revisions in 2023. As a specialist, it is now much easier (and appropriate) to code a higher level E&M!
The new rules are based on medical decision making (MDM) or time spent. With MDM, coding is based on problems and data or risk. With time, it is based on not only time spent with the patient, but also time spent reviewing records, educating caregivers, and documentation!
Non-invasive areterial studies can be performed on the following:
Adults over 65 years of age
Adults over 50 years of age and over with a history of tobacco use and/or diabetes and/or coronary artery disease
Adults with abnormal lower extremity vascular PE
Adults with leg symptoms consistent with lower extremity PAD
Adults with chronic lower extremity ulcer
Must document an order AND a hard copy of the study results with interpretation of the findings.
What are the Signature Requirements for Documents?
Medicare providers must comply with documentation requirements including timeliness of provider signature. Without a signed document, a claim cannot be submitted to the payer. With that in mind, this is real incentive to complete your documentation in a timely manner.
What is "timely"? Medicare is vague, they say "during or as soon as practicable after it is provided in order to maintain an accurate medical record". What?! So just what does that mean? What is practicable to one is different to another. This is where your power of reason comes in. Some publications say 72 hours, is this reasonable? Would you want your claim being held any longer than that? These are up for your consideration.
https://www.cms.gov/outreach-and-education/medicare-learning-network-mln/mlnproducts/downloads/signature_requirements_fact_sheet_icn905364.pdf
Z79.85 inj long term use antidiabetic drug
Use with E08, E09, E11, E13 codes as 2nd dx. Use more than one if appropriate. There are other Z codes in the family. They tell the payer how the patient's diabetes is being managed.
Z59.82, 86, 87 social determinants, these can be used for e&m coding, to tell the payer about risk factors.
15853 & 4, removal of sutures and/or staples.
Use for 0 day global procedures such as amputations and 28001-3. Bill with appropriate e&m because these are add on codes
76882 has had it's definition clarified to include the term focal evaluation, 76883 has been added for comprehensive ultrasound of an entire structure
Coding has nothing to do with $$ or RVU’s.
Jeffrey Lehrman DPM FASPS MAPWCA CPC• 1st
Coding has nothing to do with $$ or RVU’s.
Coding education should only be about following the rules and getting it right.
There is no such thing as “strategic coding.”
Chapter IV, Section A of the 2023 NCCI Policy Manual states:
"A provider/supplier shall not report multiple HCPCS/CPT codes if a
single HCPCS/CPT code exists that describes the services.” For example, if a transmetatarsal amputation is performed, the CPT® code whose descriptor is ““Amputation, foot; transmetatarsal” should be selected. Breaking down the procedure into a bunch of other codes because it pays more is the definition of unbundling….and is a bad thing to do.
2023 brings on a new challenge with many MA and commercial payers denying claims that are properly coded with 59, XS or 25 modifiers. The payer wants to see your documentation, appeal the claim. If you believe your documentation properly supports the use of the modifiers, APMA wants to see that documentation and the denial so they can fight these system edits. Redact all HIPAA information and email the information to healthpolicy.hpp@apma.org
If we do not do our part by appealing these claims, APMA and other Podiatric Associations at the state level have nothing to bring to the powers that be to make changes.
New Modifier Requirement for Skin Substitutes and Grafts
Beginning July 1 2023 CMS requires the use of JZ modifier when there is no waste. The rule for the JW modifier has not changed, still code the wasted units on a separage line with a JW modifier, no JZ required in this scenario.
www.cms.gov/files/document/mm13056-new-jz-claims-modifier-certain-medicare-part-b-drugs.pdf